Literature review on acceptance level of

Opinion consensus Opinion consensus This table has been adapted and simplified from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine — Levels of Evidence and further information about each type of study is provided below.

Literature review on acceptance level of

Before we go into where you can locate the Literature review on acceptance level of that you need for this, we need to talk about what types of publications can be considered for this task and what their order of importance is.

Literature Reviews: An Overview for Graduate Students.

First off, you need to be aware that your survey has to come from peer reviewed sources, seminal texts, acclaimed books and book chapters and respected academic websites. So, the order of desirability of where you get your citations from, goes like this: These are journals that have been integrated into one of the Thomson Reuter databases, either the web of science or the web of knowledge.

Peer Reviewed Academic Journals. There are a lot of journals that have not been around long enough to become a part of the Thomson Reuter database, or that for various other reasons fall short of the criteria for becoming citation indexed with TR.

The good ones amongst them will however belong to other indexing systems, such as for example Scopus. Some journals will proudly proclaim that they are indexed by Google Scholar!

This is nonsensical since google scholar will collect anything.

Educational Research Review - Journal - Elsevier

Even stuff that I have on my personal website is in there! These are taken from books of related essays that are put together by an editor who works together with a board of peer reviewers. A good conference will provide a publication with an ISBN or ISSN number which is the collection of academic papers published in the context of the conference.

They are usually distributed as printed volumes or in electronic form either before the conference opens or after it has closed. A lot of proceedings are also published as books, such as for example the Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science series.

Papers published in proceedings and articles very often also have doi number digital object identifier attached to them when you look for them online.

This is a character string used to uniquely identify an electronic document. Metadata about the object is stored in association with the doi name and this metadata may include a location, such as a URL, where the object can be found.

Literature review on acceptance level of

While a monograph published by a reputable academic publisher is perfectly acceptable, a lot of books are privately funded and thus not peer reviewed by an editorial board.

These are not considered to be too terribly significant. The general ones such as for example Britannica are not deemed to be very desirable, for the simple reason that they usually lack a sufficient depth of content.

However, there are also domain-specific, scientific encyclopedias in which specialists of a field write in-depth, lengthy entries that are published under their own names, together with the name of the editor, as well as the date of authorship as part of the meta-data.

Needless to say, these texts are very valid citation material indeed. As for wikipedia - that one is a big no no I'm afraid, no matter how wonderful the article you find there may turn out to be.

As you can see I am using wikipedia quite a bit whilst preparing this blog, and it really is an excellent resource for just such a purpose. The problem with wikipedia, when it comes to academic writing, is that 1 there is no identifiable board of editors, and 2 contributions are made anonymously, which effectively stops it from being an academic source that can be "quoted" since a quote will always need an author and a date.

This article is a part of the guide:

However, wikipedia is excellent as a start out point, especially through the material that it provides to help you look further that is given through links.Information Technology Adoption Models at Firm Level: Review of Literature.

Oliveira, Tiago; Martins, Maria Fraga // Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Management;, p Today, information technology (IT) is universally regarded as an essential tool in enhancing the competitiveness of the economy of a .

OSAM (Online Shopping Acceptance Model) to explain consumer acceptance of online shopping. Our literature survey reveals that a myriad of factors have been examined in the context of online shopping and mixed results on. Literature Review Submitted by: Adhil Ahmeh Sagir Deepak George George Thomas K Mahesh Kolary Amit Kumar Das Literature review Introduction Mobile phones, which were introduced around a decade ago in– in India, are becoming the dominant means of accessing communication.

Jul 13,  · It was reported by (June 8, ) that a survey was conducted by the Pew Research Center, which results made the Philippines rank 10 out of 17 countries as one of the most gay-friendly countries because of the country’s high level of public acceptance of homosexuals.

Jan 15,  · Session presented on Thursday, September 25, Factors influencing parental HPV vaccine acceptance based on child gender: A literature review, Joyce Apted, RN, MSN, CPNP.

Your literature review should be guided by a central research question. Remember, it is not a collection of loosely related studies in a field but instead represents background and research developments related to a specific research question, interpreted and analyzed by you in a synthesized way.

A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories - ScienceDirect